Scenario in benchmark · Version 1
A document with figures and captions
A document contains a figure with its caption attached.
How the tools performed
Every in-scope tool is visible. Outcomes come from current published Results for this scenario and benchmark version.
No published results for this scenario yet.
No published result does not tell you whether a tool has been tested. Test coverage is shown only for comparable published Results.
| Tool | Published outcomes | Test coverage | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| No published result · alphabetical | |||
| doc2mark | — | — | No published result |
| Docling | — | — | No published result |
| GPT-5.6 terra | — | — | No published result |
| LiteParse | — | — | No published result |
| Marker | — | — | No published result |
| MarkItDown | — | — | No published result |
| MinerU | — | — | No published result |
| olmOCR | — | — | No published result |
| PaddleOCR-VL | — | — | No published result |
| PyMuPDF4LLM | — | — | No published result |
Assessed = Pass + Fail + Not gradable. Gradable = Pass + Fail. Both use the published Result’s pinned-test denominator. — means not publicly available.
Test design
- Pinned test cases
- 1
- Disclosure
- 1 public · 0 withheld
- Capabilities exercised here
- Figures & Charts
What this scenario evaluates
- Whether the figure is preserved rather than omitted or replaced by surrounding prose.
- Whether the figure remains positioned in the output at the point where it belongs in the document flow.
- Whether the caption stays attached to the figure and remains associated with it.
Exact wording, inputs, fixture state, expected output and detailed grading remain at the test-case level and may be withheld while the benchmark version is active. The scenario and its evaluation intent are public.
How the results are graded
- Pass: the test-case expectations hold.
- Fail: an expectation demonstrably does not hold.
- Not gradable: the evidence cannot establish the outcome.
Version 1 uses test-case expectations; no scenario rubric is pinned.
Benchmark methodology →