Scenario in benchmark · Version 1
Footnotes at the bottom of the page
A footnote stays separate from the main text and remains linked to the content it annotates.
How the tools performed
Every in-scope tool is visible. Outcomes come from current published Results for this scenario and benchmark version.
No published results for this scenario yet.
No published result does not tell you whether a tool has been tested. Test coverage is shown only for comparable published Results.
| Tool | Published outcomes | Test coverage | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| No published result · alphabetical | |||
| doc2mark | — | — | No published result |
| Docling | — | — | No published result |
| GPT-5.6 terra | — | — | No published result |
| LiteParse | — | — | No published result |
| Marker | — | — | No published result |
| MarkItDown | — | — | No published result |
| MinerU | — | — | No published result |
| olmOCR | — | — | No published result |
| PaddleOCR-VL | — | — | No published result |
| PyMuPDF4LLM | — | — | No published result |
Assessed = Pass + Fail + Not gradable. Gradable = Pass + Fail. Both use the published Result’s pinned-test denominator. — means not publicly available.
Test design
- Pinned test cases
- 1
- Disclosure
- 1 public · 0 withheld
- Capabilities exercised here
- Heading & Section Structure
What this scenario evaluates
- Whether the footnote is kept outside the main body flow.
- Whether the footnote remains present.
- Whether the footnote stays associated with the content it annotates.
Exact wording, inputs, fixture state, expected output and detailed grading remain at the test-case level and may be withheld while the benchmark version is active. The scenario and its evaluation intent are public.
How the results are graded
- Pass: the test-case expectations hold.
- Fail: an expectation demonstrably does not hold.
- Not gradable: the evidence cannot establish the outcome.
Version 1 uses test-case expectations; no scenario rubric is pinned.
Benchmark methodology →