Can Quizgecko grade a learner who gets some fixed-answer questions right and some wrong?
Quizgecko handled the mixed fixed-answer attempt correctly. In the visible question samples, one answer was marked Correct and another Incorrect, and the results table ended at 17 correct, 36 incorrect, and 53 answered.
1 of 1 test case passed
Every test case in this scenario has a result.
The test case
Each test case is judged on its own: Pass, Fail, Not gradable, or Untested. The scenario result above counts this row.
Mixed correct and incorrect fixed answersPassEvidence
The tool's reply is shown in the evidence under Proofs.
| ✓ | Expected: Each response is judged against the key, with correct and incorrect responses told apart and the final total matching those judgments.Found: Question 1 was Correct, question 6 was Incorrect, and the summary showed 17 Correct, 36 Incorrect, and 53 Answered. |
The quiz graded the visible answers against the key, marking correct and incorrect choices differently. The question-by-question judgments and the 53-question totals in the results table and recording match those marks.
Raw math formatting. Some numbers appear as unformatted markup in the questions, but grading still works.
Immediate grading. Each question is scored as soon as it is answered, rather than only at the end.
Configuration and setup
How this tool was set up for the run and what the test needed in place. Each row is a fact from the run's records; a fact the records do not hold is left out, not guessed.
How this scenario is graded
How we decide Pass, Fail and Not gradable. The same rules apply to every tool tested on this scenario.
Each test case gets one result per tool: Pass, Fail or Not gradable. A test case we haven't run yet shows Untested. There are no partial results.
- Pass: the tool did everything the test expected, and nothing it said contradicts the correct answer.
- Fail: at least one expected behaviour clearly didn't happen; the row says which and quotes the tool.
- Not gradable: our evidence couldn't settle the outcome (for example a record we needed is missing). It is never counted as a fail, and the row says what's missing.
Where this sits in the benchmark
This page is one cell of a larger study: one tool, one scenario. Only this benchmark's frame appears here.
| Level | Name | Scope |
|---|---|---|
| Benchmark | Quiz Generation → | 15 scenarios · 10 tools |
| Capability | Grading → | |
| Scenario | The learner answers some fixed-answer questions correctly and others incorrectly → | |
| Tool | Quizgecko → |
Global scenario definition → · Global capability definition → · Quizgecko product page →
History of this result
What has happened to this result since it was first published. Runs and grades are never overwritten: a retest or a re-grade publishes a new result and keeps the earlier one readable.
Act on this result
Nothing filed here edits the run or the grade. A challenge opens a review, and a review can produce a new run or a re-grade — which becomes the current result and leaves this one in the history.
You run the same kind of test against your own setup and get the same behaviour.
Agree →Yours behaves differently. Tell us what you got, with a screenshot if you have one.
Disagree →Something here is wrong — a reference value, a transcription, a grade.
Report an issue →Tell us what changed and we schedule a rerun of the failing test case. The old result stays as history.
Vendor notice →The same record is available as structured data through the AI Demos MCP server, with the counts, the coverage and every per-test-case reason carried as fields.
Verify the proof files
These files support this result. Open a file to inspect the original evidence.
File fingerprints (SHA-256)
A fingerprint identifies the exact file used for this result.