Scenario in benchmark · Version 1

One topic is weaker than the others

Two otherwise equivalent learner histories differ only in which topic is weaker.

How the tools performed

Every in-scope tool is visible. Outcomes come from current published Results for this scenario and benchmark version.

No published results for this scenario yet.

No published result does not tell you whether a tool has been tested. Test coverage is shown only for comparable published Results.

ToolPublished outcomesTest coverageResult
No published result · alphabetical
DoctoQuiz——No published result
Edcafe AI——No published result
GPT-5.6 terra——No published result
Knowt——No published result
PDF to Quiz——No published result
QuestionWell——No published result
Quizgecko——No published result
Quizizz——No published result
QuizRise——No published result
Studyglen——No published result

Assessed = Pass + Fail + Not gradable. Gradable = Pass + Fail. Both use the published Result’s pinned-test denominator. — means not publicly available.

Test design

Pinned test cases
1
Disclosure
0 public · 1 withheld
Capabilities exercised here
Personalized Practice

What this scenario evaluates

  • Whether the practice focus changes when the performance history changes.
  • Whether each learner is directed toward the topic they were weaker on.
  • Whether the system avoids giving both histories the same fixed focus despite opposite strengths and weaknesses.

Exact wording, inputs, fixture state, expected output and detailed grading remain at the test-case level and may be withheld while the benchmark version is active. The scenario and its evaluation intent are public.

How the results are graded

  • Pass: the test-case expectations hold.
  • Fail: an expectation demonstrably does not hold.
  • Not gradable: the evidence cannot establish the outcome.

Version 1 uses test-case expectations; no scenario rubric is pinned.

Benchmark methodology →
One topic is weaker than the others in Quiz Generation | AI Demos