Scenario in benchmark · Version 1
The learner gives a clearly wrong answer
A learner gives a wrong answer that comes from a recognisable misunderstanding rather than a random guess.
How the tools performed
Every in-scope tool is visible. Outcomes come from current published Results for this scenario and benchmark version.
No published results for this scenario yet.
No published result does not tell you whether a tool has been tested. Test coverage is shown only for comparable published Results.
| Tool | Published outcomes | Test coverage | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| No published result · alphabetical | |||
| DoctoQuiz | — | — | No published result |
| Edcafe AI | — | — | No published result |
| GPT-5.6 terra | — | — | No published result |
| Knowt | — | — | No published result |
| PDF to Quiz | — | — | No published result |
| QuestionWell | — | — | No published result |
| Quizgecko | — | — | No published result |
| Quizizz | — | — | No published result |
| QuizRise | — | — | No published result |
| Studyglen | — | — | No published result |
Assessed = Pass + Fail + Not gradable. Gradable = Pass + Fail. Both use the published Result’s pinned-test denominator. — means not publicly available.
Test design
- Pinned test cases
- 1
- Disclosure
- 0 public · 1 withheld
- Capabilities exercised here
- Answer Feedback
What this scenario evaluates
- Whether the answer is plainly wrong.
- Whether the wrong answer reflects a recognisable misunderstanding.
- Whether the wrongness is not just an arbitrary guess.
Exact wording, inputs, fixture state, expected output and detailed grading remain at the test-case level and may be withheld while the benchmark version is active. The scenario and its evaluation intent are public.
How the results are graded
- Pass: the test-case expectations hold.
- Fail: an expectation demonstrably does not hold.
- Not gradable: the evidence cannot establish the outcome.
Version 1 uses test-case expectations; no scenario rubric is pinned.
Benchmark methodology →