It generally extracts bank-statement and invoice fields correctly, including customer, branch, summary, account, balance, and invoice totals/metadata, but one invoice payment_terms field kept the source label instead of only the requested value.
What was measured
Extraction Accuracy
Are field values correct, complete, and free of OCR or parsing errors, including numerical precision on financial fields?
decisive for this rankingtransformation
Correct field values are the core of the job; wrong or incomplete extraction means the tool failed to retrieve the structured data from the document. (3 of 3 judges)
What was given, what came back
Input — what we sent
No input — this is a capability finding
The observation is about the tool itself rather than one test input, so there is nothing to show on this side by design.
Output — unretouched
No output artifact
The verdict rests on the tester's written observation alone — no file was captured for this cell.
Provenance
- Observation
- 2ab75264-3655-4611-88e7-877f52d4ec69
- Evidence run
- a061b9e7-a9c5-443d-a171-b296aaf51b8c
- Study
- Extract and query structured data from documents using natural language
- Research task
- 86b9y25e5
- Tested at
- not recorded
- Source
- aggregate-synthesis
- Evidence state
- observed
- Proof shown
- no artifact
- Cost / latency
- not captured
- Repeat run
- not captured
- Tester
- not captured
The last three rows are honest blanks, not placeholders — our capture has no field for them yet.
Query this
get_evidence({
tool: "retab"
})MCP · mcp.aidemos.com/api/mcp
Free with attribution.
Same input, same check — 0 other tools
measured on Extraction Accuracy
No other tool was measured on this criterion for this input.
This evidence is published in
Real inputs and real outputs, no retouching · every cell queryable via API & MCP · aidemos.com