Scenario in benchmark · Version 1
The retrieved sources disagree with each other
When retrieved sources give different values for the same fact.
How the tools performed
Every in-scope tool is visible. Outcomes come from current published Results for this scenario and benchmark version.
No published results for this scenario yet.
No published result does not tell you whether a tool has been tested. Test coverage is shown only for comparable published Results.
| Tool | Published outcomes | Test coverage | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| No published result · alphabetical | |||
| Denser AI | — | — | No published result |
| Dify | — | — | No published result |
| FutureSmart Document Intelligence | — | — | No published result |
| Llama Cloud | — | — | No published result |
| Onyx | — | — | No published result |
| Vectara | — | — | No published result |
| Vectorize.io | — | — | No published result |
Assessed = Pass + Fail + Not gradable. Gradable = Pass + Fail. Both use the published Result’s pinned-test denominator. — means not publicly available.
Test design
- Pinned test cases
- 1
- Disclosure
- 0 public · 1 withheld
- Capabilities exercised here
- Grounded Generation
What this scenario evaluates
- Whether the answer recognises that the retrieved sources conflict on the same fact.
- Whether the answer avoids presenting one source’s value as the fact.
- Whether the answer conveys that the sources disagree instead of choosing a side without support.
Exact wording, inputs, fixture state, expected output and detailed grading remain at the test-case level and may be withheld while the benchmark version is active. The scenario and its evaluation intent are public.
How the results are graded
- Pass: the test-case expectations hold.
- Fail: an expectation demonstrably does not hold.
- Not gradable: the evidence cannot establish the outcome.
Version 1 uses test-case expectations; no scenario rubric is pinned.
Benchmark methodology →