Scenario in benchmark · Version 1
The retrieved material supports an answer
The retrieved material contains support for the answer.
How the tools performed
Every in-scope tool is visible. Outcomes come from current published Results for this scenario and benchmark version.
No published results for this scenario yet.
No published result does not tell you whether a tool has been tested. Test coverage is shown only for comparable published Results.
| Tool | Published outcomes | Test coverage | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| No published result · alphabetical | |||
| Denser AI | — | — | No published result |
| Dify | — | — | No published result |
| FutureSmart Document Intelligence | — | — | No published result |
| Llama Cloud | — | — | No published result |
| Onyx | — | — | No published result |
| Vectara | — | — | No published result |
| Vectorize.io | — | — | No published result |
Assessed = Pass + Fail + Not gradable. Gradable = Pass + Fail. Both use the published Result’s pinned-test denominator. — means not publicly available.
Test design
- Pinned test cases
- 1
- Disclosure
- 0 public · 1 withheld
- Capabilities exercised here
- Grounded Generation
What this scenario evaluates
- Whether the retrieved material contains enough support for the claim being made.
- Whether the system can ground its response in the retrieved material rather than outside knowledge.
- Whether the case is treated as a supported baseline, not as an unsupported or missing-answer case.
Exact wording, inputs, fixture state, expected output and detailed grading remain at the test-case level and may be withheld while the benchmark version is active. The scenario and its evaluation intent are public.
How the results are graded
- Pass: the test-case expectations hold.
- Fail: an expectation demonstrably does not hold.
- Not gradable: the evidence cannot establish the outcome.
Version 1 uses test-case expectations; no scenario rubric is pinned.
Benchmark methodology →