Can Landing AI process scanned pages inside a mixed digital PDF?
Landing AI failed this mixed PDF scenario: it returned the scanned-page values and the digital line items correctly, but total_due came back as “#1,246.80” instead of “£1,246.80”.
1 of 1 test case failed
Every test case in this scenario has a result.
The test case
Each test case is judged on its own: Pass, Fail, Not gradable, or Untested. The scenario result above counts this row.
Values on both digital and scanned pagesFailEvidence
{ "data": { "total_due": "#1,246.80", "received_by": "J. Whitlock", "vehicle_registration": "LR19 KVM", "line_item_description": "Dosing pump, 240V, Chemical feed tubing, 10m coil, Inline flow sensor" }, "extractionMetadata": { "total_due": { "value": "#1,246.80", "ranges": [ { "start": 1815, "end": 1824 }, { "start": 761, "end": 788 } ] }, "received_by": { "value": "J. Whitlock", "ranges": [ { "start": 969, "end": 986 } ] }, "vehicle_registration": { "value": "LR19 KVM", "ranges": [ { "start": 839, "end": 869 } ] }, "line_item_description": { "value": "Dosing pump, 240V, Chemical feed tubing, 10m coil, Inline flow sensor", "ranges": [ { "start": 1331, "end": 1348 }, { "start": 1425, "end": 1455 }, { "start": 1531, "end": 1549 }, { "start": 885, "end": 918 } ] } }, "extract_id": "extract-01m4an9njhahxsteszb434cx21", "parse_run_id": "parse-01m4an8yxeaj98q65443v587vd", "created_at": "2026-10-07T07:47:32.265Z" }
Copied from Proof 1 · Output file (text), lines 1–17
Open the text file ↗Its contents are printed above, under What the tool returned.
Open the text file ↗| ✗ | Expected: All values returned, with no scanned values missing or invented, no digital values degraded, and an honest note if part could not be read.Found: All four values were returned; the scanned-page values were exact, and total_due appeared as “#1,246.80” instead of “£1,246.80”. |
The check asked for values across the digital and scanned pages. Landing AI returned all four values; the two scanned-page values and the three line-item descriptions were exact, but total_due showed “#1,246.80” instead of “£1,246.80”.
Source ranges shown. The response includes source character ranges for each extracted value, so each value can be traced back to the document text.
Configuration and setup
How this tool was set up for the run and what the test needed in place. Each row is a fact from the run's records; a fact the records do not hold is left out, not guessed.
How this scenario is graded
How we decide Pass, Fail and Not gradable. The same rules apply to every tool tested on this scenario.
Each test case gets one result per tool: Pass, Fail or Not gradable. A test case we haven't run yet shows Untested. There are no partial results.
- Pass: the tool did everything the test expected, and nothing it said contradicts the correct answer.
- Fail: at least one expected behaviour clearly didn't happen; the row says which and quotes the tool.
- Not gradable: our evidence couldn't settle the outcome (for example a record we needed is missing). It is never counted as a fail, and the row says what's missing.
Where this sits in the benchmark
This page is one cell of a larger study: one tool, one scenario. Only this benchmark's frame appears here.
| Level | Name | Scope |
|---|---|---|
| Benchmark | Structured Document Extraction → | 19 scenarios · 10 tools |
| Capability | OCR → | |
| Scenario | A document mixing digital and scanned pages → | |
| Tool | Landing AI → |
Global scenario definition → · Global capability definition → · Landing AI product page →
History of this result
What has happened to this result since it was first published. Runs and grades are never overwritten: a retest or a re-grade publishes a new result and keeps the earlier one readable.
Act on this result
Nothing filed here edits the run or the grade. A challenge opens a review, and a review can produce a new run or a re-grade — which becomes the current result and leaves this one in the history.
You run the same kind of test against your own setup and get the same behaviour.
Agree →Yours behaves differently. Tell us what you got, with a screenshot if you have one.
Disagree →Something here is wrong — a reference value, a transcription, a grade.
Report an issue →Tell us what changed and we schedule a rerun of the failing test case. The old result stays as history.
Vendor notice →The same record is available as structured data through the AI Demos MCP server, with the counts, the coverage and every per-test-case reason carried as fields.
Verify the proof files
These files support this result. Open a file to inspect the original evidence.
File fingerprints (SHA-256)
A fingerprint identifies the exact file used for this result.