AI Demos Research — the structured-intelligence platform. Every verdict on these pages opens to the execution behind it.
Graded 8 October 2026

Can Landing AI leave a non-record out of the extracted set?

Landing AI left the non-record out of the extracted set in the tested invoice. The output contained five members, matching the five numbered rows, and it did not include the separate Total row or its 1,982.00 amount. The schema description shown in the capture was neutral.

1 of 1 test case passed

Every test case in this scenario has a result.

Pass rate100%1 of 1 with a result
Coverage1 of 1test cases with a result
1PassDid everything it was expected to do.
0FailNo test case failed.
0Not gradableEvery result here could be graded.
0UntestedEvery test case in this scenario has a result.
The pass rate is a summary. The evidence is the test case below: what we sent, what we checked, what the tool returned, and the proof.

The test case

Each test case is judged on its own: Pass, Fail, Not gradable, or Untested. The scenario result above counts this row.

Total row is not a memberPassEvidence
What we sent
InputDocument (PDF)
Invoice page with five numbered rows and a separate Total row.
Open the PDF ↗
What the tool returned
Text38 lines
{
  "data": {
    "line_items": [
      {
        "description": "Retail Shelving Unit - Steel, 5-Tier",
        "quantity": "6",
        "unit_price": "84.00",
        "amount": "504.00"
      },
      {
        "description": "Checkout Counter - Laminate Top",
        "quantity": "2",
        "unit_price": "310.00",
        "amount": "620.00"
      },
      {
        "description": "Security Tag Deactivator - Handheld",
        "quantity": "4",
        "unit_price": "45.50",
        "amount": "182.00"
      },
      {
        "description": "Price Label Printer - Thermal",
        "quantity": "3",
        "unit_price": "162.00",
        "amount": "486.00"
      },
      {
        "description": "Shopping Basket - 20L, Set of 10",
        "quantity": "5",
        "unit_price": "38.00",
        "amount": "190.00"
      }
    ]
  },
  "extract_id": "(neutral-schema re-run; see note in ClickUp page)",
  "note": "5 items returned, the Total row (1,982.00) is not in the output. Each value also carries a source character range in extractionMetadata."
}

Copied from Proof 1 · Output file (text), lines 1–38

Open the text file ↗
Proof 1Output file (text)
JSON output listing five line items and excluding the Total row.

Its contents are printed above, under What the tool returned.

Open the text file ↗
Expected vs. Found
✓Expected: The genuine members only, with count and membership reported separately.Found: Five members were returned, and the Total row was absent.
Supporting proof
Proof 2Screenshot
Playground view with invoice preview, five-item result, and line_items schema.
Open original ↗
Why this result

The output kept the five real line items and excluded the Total row. The count and the returned fields match the numbered rows, and no returned member carries Total or 1,982.00.

Tested by Rugved nichite · evidence dated 7 October 2026

Configuration and setup

How this tool was set up for the run and what the test needed in place. Each row is a fact from the run's records; a fact the records do not hold is left out, not guessed.

Software that produced the output
Landing AI
Build or version
DPT-3 Pro (parse model; app version not exposed)
Model
DPT-3 Pro
Surface
Web app
Set up before the run
A matching invoice table included one extra row in the same shape, clearly marked as not a member. The product was asked to extract only the real members.
Root field
line_items
Field description
List of line items on the invoice
Tested
7 October 2026 · Rugved nichite

How this scenario is graded

How we decide Pass, Fail and Not gradable. The same rules apply to every tool tested on this scenario.

How results are decided

Each test case gets one result per tool: Pass, Fail or Not gradable. A test case we haven't run yet shows Untested. There are no partial results.

The rules
  • Pass: the tool did everything the test expected, and nothing it said contradicts the correct answer.
  • Fail: at least one expected behaviour clearly didn't happen; the row says which and quotes the tool.
  • Not gradable: our evidence couldn't settle the outcome (for example a record we needed is missing). It is never counted as a fail, and the row says what's missing.

Where this sits in the benchmark

This page is one cell of a larger study: one tool, one scenario. Only this benchmark's frame appears here.

History of this result

What has happened to this result since it was first published. Runs and grades are never overwritten: a retest or a re-grade publishes a new result and keeps the earlier one readable.

from the publication record
9 October 2026First publishedStructured Document Extraction v1

Act on this result

Nothing filed here edits the run or the grade. A challenge opens a review, and a review can produce a new run or a re-grade — which becomes the current result and leaves this one in the history.

This matches what I see

You run the same kind of test against your own setup and get the same behaviour.

Agree →
This does not match

Yours behaves differently. Tell us what you got, with a screenshot if you have one.

Disagree →
Point out an issue

Something here is wrong — a reference value, a transcription, a grade.

Report an issue →
Request a retest

On a newer build, a larger dataset, or your own setup.

Request a retest →
We have fixed this

Tell us what changed and we schedule a rerun of the failing test case. The old result stays as history.

Vendor notice →
Filed against this evidenceNothing yet. Challenges, counter-evidence and fix notices appear here with their outcome, and stay on the page after they are resolved.
Cite this result
aidemos.com/benchmarks/structured-document-extraction/results/landing-ai/the-set-contains-a-non-record · 1 pass · 0 fail · coverage 1/1 · graded 2026-10-08

The same record is available as structured data through the AI Demos MCP server, with the counts, the coverage and every per-test-case reason carried as fields.

Verify the proof files

These files support this result. Open a file to inspect the original evidence.

Input · Document (PDF) ↗application/pdf · 55 KB
Proof 2 · Screenshot ↗image/png · 142 KB
Proof 1 · Output file (text) ↗text/plain; charset=utf-8 · 1 KB
File fingerprints (SHA-256)

A fingerprint identifies the exact file used for this result.

Input · Document (PDF)791590c9d422110ebebf3c1e434eebac20aff3c6728024693becc870818c26d8
Proof 2 · Screenshot0add229894fb65ff473ea91aa803b7663d960187fe3079ccef36debff4d64b8e
Proof 1 · Output file (text)fe736fb0ad925726f00187b8fc3e19b27c678ba53b6f0644e559f64b5bc08cd7