AI Demos Research — the structured-intelligence platform. Every verdict on these pages opens to the execution behind it.
Graded 8 October 2026

Can Landing AI keep one array when a set continues across a page break?

Landing AI kept the repeated set in one array when the data crossed a page break. In the checked case, ten line items appeared in document order with no duplicate at the boundary, and the results panel showed the array opening once and closing once. No other case is reported here.

1 of 1 test case passed

Every test case in this scenario has a result.

Pass rate100%1 of 1 with a result
Coverage1 of 1test cases with a result
1PassDid everything it was expected to do.
0FailNo test case failed.
0Not gradableEvery result here could be graded.
0UntestedEvery test case in this scenario has a result.
The pass rate is a summary. The evidence is the test case below: what we sent, what we checked, what the tool returned, and the proof.

The test case

Each test case is judged on its own: Pass, Fail, Not gradable, or Untested. The scenario result above counts this row.

Set continues past a page boundaryPassEvidence
What we sent
InputDocument (PDF)
Two-page invoice with ten line items and a repeated header on page 2.
Open the PDF ↗
What the tool returned
Text50 lines
{
  "data": {
    "line_items": [
      {
        "description": "Retail Shelving Unit - Steel, 5-Tier",
        "amount": "1,008.00"
      },
      {
        "description": "Checkout Counter - Laminate Top",
        "amount": "930.00"
      },
      {
        "description": "Security Tag Deactivator - Handheld",
        "amount": "273.00"
      },
      {
        "description": "Price Label Printer - Thermal",
        "amount": "648.00"
      },
      {
        "description": "Shopping Basket - 20L, Set of 10",
        "amount": "304.00"
      },
      {
        "description": "Storeroom Pallet Racking - 4-Bay",
        "amount": "1,080.00"
      },
      {
        "description": "Barcode Scanner - Wireless",
        "amount": "580.00"
      },
      {
        "description": "Receipt Paper Roll - Case of 50",
        "amount": "330.00"
      },
      {
        "description": "Mannequin - Adjustable, Full Body",
        "amount": "570.00"
      },
      {
        "description": "Display Signage Kit - Window Set",
        "amount": "380.00"
      }
    ]
  },
  "extractionMetadata_note": "each description and amount carries a source character range; ranges for items 1-6 fall at positions 642-1224 of the parsed text (page 1) and for items 7-10 at 1675-2043 (page 2)",
  "extract_id": "extract-01m4ap5w5dt4e0tjvekfyprd0h",
  "parse_run_id": "parse-01m4ap57pzff45x76tt23ck1g8",
  "created_at": "2026-10-07T08:02:54.827Z"
}

Copied from Proof 1 · Output file (text), lines 1–50

Open the text file ↗
Proof 1Output file (text)
Saved JSON output shows one ten-item array and trailing metadata.

Its contents are printed above, under What the tool returned.

Open the text file ↗
Expected vs. Found
✓Expected: One array with all members, no duplicate at the boundary.Found: The output has one line_items array of ten objects in order; no boundary item is missing or duplicated.
Supporting proof
Proof 2Screenshot
First results view shows the array opening and line items 1 to 6.
Open original ↗
Proof 3Screenshot
Later results view shows items 5 to 10 and the array closing.
Open original ↗
Why this result

The invoice spans two pages with the header repeated on page 2. The output keeps ten items in one array, in order, with no duplicate at the boundary, and the results panel shows the array opening once and closing once.

Also observed on this row

Schema setup. The extraction used one list of line items, each with a description and an amount.

Tested by Rugved nichite · evidence dated 7 October 2026

Configuration and setup

How this tool was set up for the run and what the test needed in place. Each row is a fact from the run's records; a fact the records do not hold is left out, not guessed.

Software that produced the output
Landing AI
Build or version
DPT-3 Pro (parse model; app version not exposed)
Surface
Web app
Set up before the run
The same kind of repeated table and field layout was required, with each item staying whole on one page and the header repeating on page 2. The task was to extract a set that continues past a page break.
Workspace mode
Extract
Extraction schema
line_items - Array of Object
Tested
7 October 2026 · Rugved nichite

How this scenario is graded

How we decide Pass, Fail and Not gradable. The same rules apply to every tool tested on this scenario.

How results are decided

Each test case gets one result per tool: Pass, Fail or Not gradable. A test case we haven't run yet shows Untested. There are no partial results.

The rules
  • Pass: the tool did everything the test expected, and nothing it said contradicts the correct answer.
  • Fail: at least one expected behaviour clearly didn't happen; the row says which and quotes the tool.
  • Not gradable: our evidence couldn't settle the outcome (for example a record we needed is missing). It is never counted as a fail, and the row says what's missing.

Where this sits in the benchmark

This page is one cell of a larger study: one tool, one scenario. Only this benchmark's frame appears here.

History of this result

What has happened to this result since it was first published. Runs and grades are never overwritten: a retest or a re-grade publishes a new result and keeps the earlier one readable.

from the publication record
9 October 2026First publishedStructured Document Extraction v1

Act on this result

Nothing filed here edits the run or the grade. A challenge opens a review, and a review can produce a new run or a re-grade — which becomes the current result and leaves this one in the history.

This matches what I see

You run the same kind of test against your own setup and get the same behaviour.

Agree →
This does not match

Yours behaves differently. Tell us what you got, with a screenshot if you have one.

Disagree →
Point out an issue

Something here is wrong — a reference value, a transcription, a grade.

Report an issue →
Request a retest

On a newer build, a larger dataset, or your own setup.

Request a retest →
We have fixed this

Tell us what changed and we schedule a rerun of the failing test case. The old result stays as history.

Vendor notice →
Filed against this evidenceNothing yet. Challenges, counter-evidence and fix notices appear here with their outcome, and stay on the page after they are resolved.
Cite this result
aidemos.com/benchmarks/structured-document-extraction/results/landing-ai/the-set-continues-across-a-page-break · 1 pass · 0 fail · coverage 1/1 · graded 2026-10-08

The same record is available as structured data through the AI Demos MCP server, with the counts, the coverage and every per-test-case reason carried as fields.

Verify the proof files

These files support this result. Open a file to inspect the original evidence.

Input · Document (PDF) ↗application/pdf · 82 KB
Proof 2 · Screenshot ↗image/png · 146 KB
Proof 3 · Screenshot ↗image/png · 118 KB
Proof 1 · Output file (text) ↗text/plain; charset=utf-8 · 1 KB
File fingerprints (SHA-256)

A fingerprint identifies the exact file used for this result.

Input · Document (PDF)d1f3282702260730267278b1071ee30cf79918fa8489d9411c98d8f6e5209f18
Proof 2 · Screenshot660fec3c9e176fe12ec1960838feabc12fe6567a0706ac6e2c952c19f3f7cae6
Proof 3 · Screenshot638ba4d9004534b6afba78e66cc19f58780f43e682925dc9112571aecb34e57a
Proof 1 · Output file (text)7186df485e04520d35a658415e42ee8705950823411262dba23958b0f1abe8a8