AI Demos Research — the structured-intelligence platform. Every verdict on these pages opens to the execution behind it.
Graded 9 October 2026

Can Botpress handle a customer correcting information given earlier?

Botpress handled a customer correcting information given earlier in the visible chat. The agent first answered about one order, then switched to the corrected order and said it was processing with no tracking number. The first order's shipped status and tracking number did not carry over.

1 of 1 test case passed

Every test case in this scenario has a result.

Pass rate100%1 of 1 with a result
Coverage1 of 1test cases with a result
1PassDid everything it was expected to do.
0FailNo test case failed.
0Not gradableEvery result here could be graded.
0UntestedEvery test case in this scenario has a result.
The pass rate is a summary. The evidence is the test case below: what we sent, what we checked, what the tool returned, and the proof.

The test case

Each test case is judged on its own: Pass, Fail, Not gradable, or Untested. The scenario result above counts this row.

Wrong order number corrected at t2PassEvidence
What we sent

Input 1: “Where is order 41982?”

Input 2: “Sorry, wrong number - it's 41830”

What the tool returned

Response to input 1 Order 41982 is shipped. Your tracking number is 1Z999AA10123456784. Response to input 2 I'll check order 41830 now. Response to input 2 Order 41830 is currently processing. No tracking number is available yet.

Transcribed from Proof 1 · Screenshot

Transcribed from Proof 1 · Screenshot

Transcribed from Proof 1 · Screenshot

Expected vs. Found
✓Expected: Answers about the corrected order and drops the firstFound: It answered only about the corrected order as processing with no tracking number; the first order's shipped status and tracking number did not carry over.
Supporting proof
Proof 1Screenshot
Two-turn chat showing an order correction and the agent's updated reply.
Open original ↗
Why this result

The chat was checked for whether the agent kept using the corrected order after the customer changed the number. It switched to the new order and replied only about that order as processing with no tracking number.

Also observed on this row

Status from reply. The order status appears in the agent's reply; the underlying order system is not shown separately.

Tested by Ajay Vekhande · evidence dated 18 September 2026

Configuration and setup

How this tool was set up for the run and what the test needed in place. Each row is a fact from the run's records; a fact the records do not hold is left out, not guessed.

Software that produced the output
Botpress
Build or version
Not exposed by the hosted product
Plan or tier
Free plan
Surface
Web app
Set up before the run
Two real orders had to exist in the order system.
Tested
18 September 2026 · Ajay Vekhande

How this scenario is graded

How we decide Pass, Fail and Not gradable. The same rules apply to every tool tested on this scenario.

How results are decided

Each test case gets one result per tool: Pass, Fail or Not gradable. A test case we haven't run yet shows Untested. There are no partial results.

The rules
  • Pass: the tool did everything the test expected, and nothing it said contradicts the correct answer.
  • Fail: at least one expected behaviour clearly didn't happen; the row says which and quotes the tool.
  • Not gradable: our evidence couldn't settle the outcome (for example a record we needed is missing). It is never counted as a fail, and the row says what's missing.

Where this sits in the benchmark

This page is one cell of a larger study: one tool, one scenario. Only this benchmark's frame appears here.

History of this result

What has happened to this result since it was first published. Runs and grades are never overwritten: a retest or a re-grade publishes a new result and keeps the earlier one readable.

from the publication record
9 October 2026First publishedAI Customer Support Chatbots v1

Act on this result

Nothing filed here edits the run or the grade. A challenge opens a review, and a review can produce a new run or a re-grade — which becomes the current result and leaves this one in the history.

This matches what I see

You run the same kind of test against your own setup and get the same behaviour.

Agree →
This does not match

Yours behaves differently. Tell us what you got, with a screenshot if you have one.

Disagree →
Point out an issue

Something here is wrong — a reference value, a transcription, a grade.

Report an issue →
Request a retest

On a newer build, a larger dataset, or your own setup.

Request a retest →
We have fixed this

Tell us what changed and we schedule a rerun of the failing test case. The old result stays as history.

Vendor notice →
Filed against this evidenceNothing yet. Challenges, counter-evidence and fix notices appear here with their outcome, and stay on the page after they are resolved.
Cite this result
aidemos.com/benchmarks/ai-customer-support-chatbots/results/botpress/customer-corrects-information-given-earlier · 1 pass · 0 fail · coverage 1/1 · graded 2026-10-09

The same record is available as structured data through the AI Demos MCP server, with the counts, the coverage and every per-test-case reason carried as fields.

Verify the proof files

These files support this result. Open a file to inspect the original evidence.

Proof 1 · Screenshot ↗image/png · 40 KB
File fingerprints (SHA-256)

A fingerprint identifies the exact file used for this result.

Proof 1 · Screenshotc86320174b570747d231e9ac63d9fa6996c51aa66c0a34af1bf844501dd827b3