Evidence · first-party tested

It classified some bank transactions inconsistently, including a 28 Jun 19 row marked Deposit despite an extracted withdrawal amount of 399, and a merged 19 Jun 19 row marked Deposit/Withdrawal.

⚠ StruggledDatalab →
Input — the actual file we sent
Bank Statement PDF
A 4-page bank statement PDF with 51 transaction rows, balance-forward continuations, account/branch metadata, rewards information, and disclaimer text. Designed to test end-to-end structured extraction from a dense financial statement.
Output — unretouched
Bank statement 21 jun transactions.png
Bank statement 21 jun transactions.png
Output — unretouched
tool output
Output — unretouched
tool output
The observation

It classified some bank transactions inconsistently, including a 28 Jun 19 row marked Deposit despite an extracted withdrawal amount of 399, and a merged 19 Jun 19 row marked Deposit/Withdrawal.

Criterion: Semantic Field Enrichment · Scenario: Bank Statement PDF (group: financial-document-extraction)
Query this
get_evidence({
  tool: "datalab",
  scenario: "financial-document-extraction"
})
MCP · mcp.aidemos.com/api/mcp
Free with attribution.
Same input, other tools
Extend AI ✓ WorkedLanding AI ✓ WorkedLlamaParse ✓ WorkedNanonets ✗ FailedReducto ⚠ StruggledRetab ✓ Worked
Real outputs, no retouching · every cell queryable via API & MCP · aidemos.com